rConstitution.us
latest boundaries about
Freedom-Learning Curves
We need people to keep learning about freedom until they produce major gains, through constitutionalist appropriation, party rules, house rules, repeals, and ending of Progressive debt and entitlements.
James Anthony
June 15, 2025
People raise their living standards more quickly when people make themselves freer from governments.
Figure. The more freedom, the faster the increase in GDP per capita generally, for Singapore (84.4), United States (72.1), Argentina (60.6), and Vietnam (50.1) [1] (parentheses give Index of Economic Freedom scores for 2022 [2]). With the vertical scale logarithmic, exponential growth produces a straight line, with the slope steeper when the exponential growth is faster.
Learning to be freer from governments can be thought of as moving up a freedom-learning curve [3].
The figure shows the result of increasing freedom. Each move up in freedom makes the GDP per capita increase along a steeper straight line.
Learning Freedom
Each person makes his way up his own freedom-learning curve.
Donald Trump has now chosen a number of appointees [4] who could significantly limit the national government [5], including Elon Musk [6], Russ Vought [7], Robert Kennedy [8], Jay Bhattacharya [9], Pete Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and Chris Wright.
Trump quickly signed a large number of executive orders, many of which could significantly limit the national government by protecting the Constitution more faithfully, in administration, foreign policy, immigration, health, energy and the environment, policing and criminal justice, education, and technology [10].
Elon Musk, Nicole Shanahan, Ron DeSantis, and state freedom caucuses are each poised to back primary challengers. Musk [6] and Shanahan [11] each could fund considerable challenges. DeSantis has a proven PAC and platform [12]. State freedom caucuses [13] generate high-quality information by forcing recorded votes during legislative sessions, and then inform voters during primaries [14] and elections.
Politician activists, like Ron Paul earlier and Thomas Massie [15], Andy Biggs [16], and Rand Paul now, mostly lead by helping inform people. Grassroots voter activists typically have focused on a single issue like life, health freedom, arms, gold money, or homeschooling [17]. Media activists like Daniel Horowitz of Blaze Media [18], Lew Rockwell [19], Mises Institute [20], and Free the People [21] provide forward-looking information, background, theory, and ideas.
On all these fronts, people are starting to get government people to limit governments by using their powers well against others in governments—especially, even against others from their own party.
Even so, people fall into numerous traps; for example, using the so-called power of the purse [22], using the filibuster [23], reviewing regulations [24], raising tariffs [25] [26], eliminating income taxes [27], eliminating taxes on tips [28], adding term limits [29], and having state legislators select senators [30].
People need to learn what major changes will work the best.
Locking-In Major Gains
Appropriation
Legislators must pass a single total appropriation that limits the overall takings from the people. Executives must then allocate this appropriation to enforce the whole body of law.
Currently, legislatively passing line-item appropriations empowers legislators to become logrolling tyrants. This shouldn’t be. Line-item appropriations are unconstitutional grabs of a crucial executive power. Executive power includes planning budget line-item allocations, optimally adjusting for contingencies as they arise, and being fully accountable for all associated actions. Executive powers must be kept separate from legislative powers so that offsetting powers can be used to limit one another [22].
Party Rules
We need to have at least one good major party that exists solely to help voters select good people. It needs a party name that’s specific and meaningful, a party declaration that’s modeled on the Declaration of Independence, a party constitution that’s modeled on the Constitution, and party laws that reverse the Progressive parties’ candidate-selection processes [31].
Parties are the tail that wags the dog. Our last small-government major party, the initial Democrats, broke bad in 1894 [32].
House Rules
Like good party rules, good legislative-house rules need to be modeled on the Constitution. The role of states needs to be played by working groups, each limited to only addressing one of the Constitution’s clauses, and in some cases only part of one clause [33].
House rules must explicitly require legislators to ensure that each new bill and each existing statute constitutionally passes six simple pass/fail tests: (1) No misleading parts. (2) Only uses powers enumerated for the national government. (3) No delegation of legislative power. (4) No grabs of executive power. (5) No grabs of judicial power. (6) Not noncritical, complex, or long, and not helping make the total corpus of law incomprehensibly complex or long [34].
Repeals
Debt, Income, Healthcare
Apart from providing USA retirees with constitutionally-required just compensation for past takings, from which retirees otherwise could not recover, essentially all of the remaining national debt must be repudiated. A full 99.8% of it was incurred by Progressives to support their open rebellion against the we the people and our Constitution (Progressives refuse to use the Constitution’s sanctions against people in governments to limit them, which systematically deprives the Constitution’s rules of any force). The 14th Amendment requires that “all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void” [37].
Current statutes requiring taxpayers to pay in now in exchange for future income and healthcare should be repealed. Current statutes should be amended to promise taxpayers the lifetime benefits that correspond to the lifetime payments they’ve made up the amendment date. A new statute should help fulfill these promises by formally authorizing the sale of government assets and providing model terms of sale [38].
Reinforcing the Constitution
We add more value to satisfy our needs and wants when we produce and shop freely [39]. To make us freer from governments and cronies, the Constitution provides separated powers that limit each other [40].
This process is bypassed by legislative line-item appropriation logrolling, intraparty collusion, power-concentrating house rules, no repeals of past defiance, and debt and entitlement schemes.
Demolishing each of these bypassing processes is essential, and will be our next major step up in freedom.
References
James Anthony is an experienced chemical engineer who applies process design, dynamics, and control to government processes. He is the author of The Constitution Needs a Good Party and rConstitution Papers, the publisher of rConstitution.us, and an author in The Hill, Blaze Media, Western Journal, Daily Caller, The Federalist, American Thinker, Lew Rockwell, American Greatness, Mises Institute, Foundation for Economic Education, and Free the People. For more information, see his media and about pages, overview, and fresh takes on the Constitution.
Commenting