Neighborhood Cities Increase Freedom
If people in similar neighborhoods secede from big cities to form neighborhood cities, people everywhere will become more free.
December 26, 2020
In 1897, a Progressive who studied city governments concluded that if socialism ever comes, it more than likely will come by way of the city .
Now, city officials who enable monopolistic public sector unions, and the members of these unions, both are core members of today’s socialist elite . Big cities’ representatives dominate many state governments, and cities’ representatives dominate the national government. As of 2018, the districts that were predominantly either urban, urban-suburban, or inner-ring suburban elected 64% of House Democrats , who now are overtly socialist.
Dividing Problems into Simpler Components
Meanwhile, people, in the course of just going about their normal lives, regularly choose to live in specific neighborhoods. These deliberate, careful choices sort people into relatively-homogenous groups.
In any given neighborhood, the people who choose to live there would like their city government to fit their preferences more closely.
Developing a distinct government that matches the preferences of a distinct neighborhood is the established practice in newer parts of the USA. Suburban regions are almost all divided into smaller entities—cities, boroughs, townships, towns, or villages .
Urban regions are the behind-the-times exception. Big-city cores are almost all each controlled by centralized big governments.
Small, neighborhood-based city governments would take people’s careful selections of where to live and would put all this existing self-organizing to further use to fix city problems. Neighborhood cities would carve up big city-government problems into manageable, bite-sized pieces. This decentralization would enable people to experiment, learn what works best, and adopt best practices as soon as each neighborhood city’s people are ready.
Give City Governments an Inch and They’ll Take a Mile
At the time the Constitution was ratified, the people reserved to themselves the powers over religion, education, and social services. State governments had power over militias, local governments, property not in interstate commerce, family affairs, criminals, intrastate civil disputes, and businesses . City governments were delegated most power over criminal law enforcement and some power over businesses.
At first, USA governments at all levels of operation were small, and the city governments were the smallest . The first steady, unreversed growth among USA governments was the growth of city governments . The bigger the city, the bigger was the city-government growth . By 1890, the national government and the state governments had both been outgrown by the city governments .
City-government growth continues today. The national government grew much differently, mostly only ratcheting up through world wars. The state governments grew more slowly, taking until 1972 to overtake the city governments again. But except around World War II, when city governments temporarily were crowded out, city governments have mostly just kept growing .
The resulting local-government spending nowadays is summarized in the table.
Table. Local-government spending by category in 2018 ,
and potential spending in minimalist neighborhood cities
Parents as Customers, and Public Safety First
Minimalist spending would start by only retaining the spending in a few of the current categories. In those categories, minimalist spending could start at current levels and then would fall considerably.
K-12 school spending could be transferred to parents’ control through vouchers that have no strings attached.
Change that’s fast and complete is always best , both to solidify better political coalitions and to deliver the most improvement for the longest.
Here, if change is fast, then at first the nearby nongovernment schools would temporarily need to take extra steps to satisfy the extra demand, so at first their marginal costs would be higher than usual.
Transitional costs that are higher than usual for nongovernment schools could be easily covered by spending at the current levels, since compared to government schools, nongovernment schools usually average half the cost . Vouchers could at first just take the current spending for government schools and transfer this whole amount directly to parents.
As long as these high spending levels, the legacy of the government monopoly on schools, would later be cut back, the existing nongovernment schools would soon reoptimize their operations. Also, other nongovernment schools would soon start up. Under these competitive pressures, prices would soon be driven back to the longstanding norm of half the cost of government schools. From there, given the greater competition and innovation, prices would steadily improve further.
On top of that, given vouchers with no strings attached, parents would have maximum freedom to vote with their feet, and this would provide further pressure. Under all the competitive pressures, choices and quality would also steadily improve .
Public-safety spending—the table’s only substantial category that the Constitution’s ratifiers agreed was appropriate for local governments—initially could be kept as-is.
Over time, especially as nearby neighborhood cities were organized and made the local market larger, neighborhoods could sooner or later purchase these services from competitive security-business startups, and quality and pricing would improve.
By focusing attention on this core function and on the results, a given neighborhood-city’s people might decide either to buy more public-safety services or to buy fewer, whichever improves these people’s quality of life.
General debt and insurance-trust pension spending would be immediately stopped from growing larger, could be fully funded if needed, and could be retired if desired.
Free People Are Generous and Shop Well
The remaining, non-minimalist spending would be left to individuals to choose for themselves.
Social services, income maintenance, and housing are naturals to be provided by individuals working directly through charities, as was done on a larger scale in the past, improving quality and pricing .
Utilities, environmental, transportation, and liquor stores are naturals to be bought by individuals  directly from businesspeople, as is done in many areas already, improving quality and pricing.
General expenditures and government administration would be negligibly small once overall operations were minimalist.
Small Steps Bring Big Freedom
Most of the skill and effort required to make neighborhood cities work well are already amply provided by people anyway in the natural way—by individually self-organizing—when people choose to live in a given neighborhood. To use these careful choices to best advantage only requires two smaller steps further:
Relatively-small steps in the right direction can make freedom grow substantially.
James Anthony is the author of The Constitution Needs a Good Party and rConstitution Papers, publishes rConstitution.us, and has written articles in The Federalist, American Thinker, and Foundation for Economic Education. He’s an experienced chemical engineer with a master’s in mechanical engineering.